Softpedia
 


MAIN CATEGORIES:


NEWS CATEGORIES:



SEND US YOUR TIPS >>
GADGET PRODUCERS LIST >>
NEWS ARCHIVE >>

TIMELINE

2012 - 2011 - 2010 2009 - 2008 - 2007 2006 - 2005 - 2004 2003 - 2002 - 2001 2000

GLOSSARY

Home / Gadgets / News / Reviews

Reviews


Canon Legria FS22 SD Camcorder Review

Adjust text size:

19th of February 2010, 06:51 GMT | By Alex Vochin


Jump to: 1. Introduction   2. Aesthetics and Design   3. Tech Facts   4. Real Life Performance   5. Conclusions


Canon Legria FS22 SD camcorder
Enlarge picture
We live in a world of high definition, being hit by the terms “Full HD” and “1080p” pretty much from all directions. I mean, when you visit a certain electronics store looking for a regular TV set, assistants will start swarming around you, trying to convince you that you have to purchase not only that “latest-gen” LED HDTV, but also a Full HD Blu-ray player and an HD-capable camera to go along. Come on, you know what we mean, you must have gone through something like this at least once in your lifetime.

Anyway, the truth of the matter is that HD is such in high demand nowadays that standard-definition (SD) cameras have already gone out of the spotlight. It doesn't matter that most people don't actually have the means of watching a clip they've recorded with their brand-new, 1080p camcorder (a.k.a. a Full HD TV set), they'll go for such a device anyway, probably believing that this sort of makes them “future-proof” or something of the kind.

After reviewing a couple of Full HD camcorders, it's about time to take our chances with a standard-resolution one, namely the Canon Legria FS22, which was officially announced back in early 2009, and which delivers at least a couple of interesting features for those people who've decided to wait a bit until moving on to HD.

From many points of view, the Legria FS22 is quite an impressive camera, delivering a very high level of portability (very small, and extremely lightweight), but also a higher level of security for the videos stored within, given the fact that it uses flash memory for storage. However, there are also several minuses to point out, some of which, sadly, affect the overall neat impression the device from Canon might leave us with.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

Go to: Next page

Jump to: 1. Introduction   2. Aesthetics and Design   3. Tech Facts   4. Real Life Performance   5. Conclusions


TAGS:

Canon | reviews | camcorders | standard-definition camcorders | flash memory camcorders
Read by 7,431 user(s) | Link to this article
 

MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Sony Handycam HDR-TG7VE Camcorder Review

Panasonic HDC-TM300 HD Camcorder Review

Samsung DualView ST550 Digital Camera Review

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX550 Compact Digital C...

Olympus E-620 DSLR Camera Review
  TWEET THIS Subscribe to news    Print article    Send to friend

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Nik on 18 Mar 2010, 13:57 GMT reply to this comment

Your review was an excellent one. I own one of these and agree with you on nearly everything stated in your article.
The one thing I disagree on is its lack of touch screen being a bad thing. Touch screens become disgusting with all those finger prints on them.

The reason this camera was so expensive is because of its 32GB flash memory.
Canon really f***d up here because the memory out ways battery live almost 3 times over on XP quality.
Canon learn't from its mistake. The predecessor FS37 comes with just 16GB of memory. Something more ideal.



WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM